Advertisers Forced to Change… Or Die



The rapid technological changes taking place today are opening up new horizons of marketing channels, while at the same time forcing some of most established advertising mediums to make radical changes themselves or go the way of the dinosaurs.

Case in point and one of the biggest budget, highest profile examples… Television Advertising – a typically PUSH oriented advertising channel!)

It is no secret now that with the advent of Tivo and other digital video recording solutions, consumers are now able to literally fast-forward past the ads that for years invaded their living rooms as they attempted to watch their favorite shows.

This new technology enables the consumer to choose whether they are going to sit through any ad or simply skip it and give their direct and indirect attention only to the show they are trying to watch.

This New Technology Enables The Consumer To Choose

This is a very troubling situation for the television networks who for so many years were able to charge exorbinant sums in exchange for companies securing a 30 to 60 second spot in the middle of their broadcasting.  In the past the target audience was close to being a captive, basically having to endure commercials in an effort to watch their favorite TV shows.

That has all changed now.

What is the solution for television advertisers and the networks selling ad time?

Well, the short-term "band aid" some networks are testing is to go way, way back to an earlier era when ads were comprised of live "plugs" for products during the feature show.  These ads were more a part of the show than an ad, making them all but completely unavoidable to the viewing audience.

One great example of this "back to the future" tactic being used are the ad spots soon to be running on late night talk show, "Jimmy Kimmel Live" as well as the Garmin spot recently aired on "The Tonight Show With Jay Leno".  Initial data collected for the spot aired shows it to be much more effective than traditional spots run in recent days.

There is a Much Deeper Problem

Now, while this flashback marketing solution seems to make sense on the surface, I propose that there is actually a much deeper problem to be faced by advertisers and their marketing teams.

I believe the question to be asked is "Why are consumers fast-forwarding through ads to begin with?"

What cacophony of praise might we have heard if the collective cheers of all DVR users could have been voiced simultaneously when they realized commercials could be skipped?

Should there be that strong a reaction?

Could it be that the public has long been growing more and more tired, if not at times disgusted, with the constant and often blatant advertising that is shoved under their nose?

Do advertisers need to shift their efforts to even more, dare I say, "creative pull marketing" as opposed to the typical "push" efforts most use?

Technology is Forcing Advertisers to Change

It is obvious that technology is forcing advertisers to change the way they do things.  This is not going to stop.

What I ask you then is this:

Does the marketing industry as a whole need to step back and evaluate the effects their messages and methods have upon consumers before yet another advertising medium joins television ads on the endangered list?

What do you think?  Share YOUR comments with us…

Onward & Upward!


Sam Knoll

Comments on Advertisers Forced to Change… Or Die Leave a Comment

May 17, 2008

gizmo @ 8:11 pm #

I already can’t stand the advertising of what’s up next on some of the tv stations during a show. In some cases it’s so bad I won’t watch the stations anymore unless there is something I really want to watch. But if they start pushing ads as well, I will never watch the station again.

July 7, 2008

Leave a Comment

Fields marked by an asterisk (*) are required.

Filed under Blog, General Musings, Offline Marketing by  #

Made with Semiologic Pro &bull